31 July 2009

We did it! WPBS will stay on the air in Ottawa!

Congratulations, fellow Ottawans! We did it!! I received the following e-mail from WPBS this morning:

July 31, 2009

Dear Friends of WPBS-TV:

CONGRATULATIONS! WPBS-TV and Rogers Cable have worked together to ensure a more reliable fiber connection, and WPBS-TV is able to continue serving the Ottawa Community! This news from Rogers could not have come at a better time. WPBS-TV and Rogers have created a more reliable feed source of our signal that is a win-win situation for both parties. In all sincerity Rogers has been kind and cooperative in the discussions with WPBS-TV over the past 48 hours.

Words alone can never describe how much the overwhelming outpour of support from our friends in the Ottawa area has meant to “the little station that could” over the past weeks. Special thanks go to the City of Ottawa Councillor Rick Chiarelli for his unwavering support, time and energy on behalf of the City of Ottawa and WPBS-TV; Gord McDougall, CFRA News Reporter & TV Commentator for his encouragement and friendship; and, the countless members, viewers, supporters & friends of WPBS-TV who refused to give up and remained committed to the end. We could name many, but without their permission we will wait to ‘brag them up.’

How does an organization go about thanking everyone for their character, depth of emotion and heart-felt hard work? We’re not quite sure just yet. But, believe us Ottawa, WPBS-TV will not let you down!

In the coming days, WPBS-TV will be creating on-air spots and making additional announcements with our on-line community of supporters. Please call us with any questions or concerns you may have. Or, just congratulate yourself on a job well done!

As always, we remain,

Tom Hanley, Lynn Brown & Staff

A big "thank you" and virtual hug to all the people who bombarded Rogers, the CRTC, Ottawa city councillors, and local newspapers with your protests against dropping WPBS! Good on ya, Ottawa.

Don't forget to tip your waitress - I'll be writing a thank you letter to the individuals mentioned above and the Ottawa city councillors, as well as Rogers and the CRTC, for their efforts in making this happen.

Now if you'll excuse me, I suspect there's something good on channel 64 right about now...

29 July 2009

Save WPBS TV in Ottawa! - Update

So far, Rogers continues to insist on dropping WPBS. In the beginning they stated that the decision was "final." But recent correspondence suggests that they're getting the message and their resistance may be softening. I received the following message this morning from Rogers' Office of the President (emphasis mine). Note the absence of the word "final," instead being replaced with "at this time":

Dear {name},

Thank you for sending your complaint to the Office of the President regarding the channel realignment that will be taking place in August. We understand that this is disruptive to some viewers and this is why we rarely make this kind of change. It has been with extensive analysis and viewer feedback that we have made this decision to acquire PBS Detroit. PBS Detroit offers higher quality reception and signal reliability. We are aware that the local programming you have enjoyed will no longer be available as a result, but have been advised that there will be similar programming available. We have received complaints pertaining to this decision, but at this time, the realignment will still take place as scheduled.

We do not take these complaints lightly, and have noted this accordingly. Your feedback in regards to this channel lineup change is taken very seriously and will be voiced. We apologize for any inconvenience that this change may cause you. Thank you for being a loyal customer to Rogers during this time period of adjustment.

Sincerely,

{name} | Rogers Communications Inc. | Advisor | Office of the
President |

Now is the time to keep up the pressure. I have been advised by one city councillor that it will help build support in city council if we contact all of the councillors.

Here is a list for your convenience:

Doug.Thompson@ottawa.ca
Eli.El-Chantiry@ottawa.ca
Rick.Chiarelli@ottawa.ca
Peggy.Feltmate@ottawa.ca
Diane.Holmes@ottawa.ca
Peter.Hume@ottawa.ca
Gord.Hunter@ottawa.ca
Rob.Jellett@ottawa.ca
Jacques.Legendre@ottawa.ca
Maria.McRae@ottawa.ca
Bob.Monette@ottawa.ca
Shad.Qadri@ottawa.ca
Marianne.Wilkinson@ottawa.ca
Jan.harder@ottawa.ca
christine.leadman@ottawa.ca
Larry.OBrien@ottawa.ca
Michel.Bellemare@ottawa.ca
Georges.Bedard@ottawa.ca
Rainer.Bloess@ottawa.ca
Glenn.Brooks@ottawa.ca
Alex.Cullen@ottawa.ca
Clive.Doucet@ottawa.ca
Steve.Desroches@ottawa.ca
Diane.Deans@ottawa.ca

Please take a few minutes and let them know how you feel about this. There is a link to a petition and more people to contact, such as Rogers managers and government officials, in my previous post.

I am also sending this information to WPBS so they can help spread the word.

28 July 2009

Save WPBS TV in Ottawa!

Rogers has decided to drop WPBS Watertown (channel 64) from its Ottawa cable lineup, despite what appears to be a sizable protest from its customers.

It is replacing it with Detroit PBS, which is 4 times farther away, which means there will no longer be PBS coverage of local events in our shared area, as there is now with Watertown PBS. We will also have less of a voice about our PBS programming, since we'll now have to compete with all of Detroit to get heard. In addition, WPBS may lose more than $300,000 in revenues from this decision since, as a border town, 70% of their audience is Canadian. Rogers claims this lineup change is at the request of its viewers, which is an insult to our intelligence considering the volume of protest against it.

WPBS is one of the few remaining channels that doesn't satisfy itself with airing a constant stream of brainless rubbish. It airs intelligent, educational, entertaining programs that serve the public good and Ottawans in particular. Thus, WPBS is one of the few reasons I still bother with Rogers Cable. Rogers' senseless decision to drop WPBS after decades of symbiotic relationship with Ottawan viewers is infuriating. It has prompted me to start researching UHF antennas in anticipation of their bullish insistence on ignoring their customers' wishes. I've put up with many other annoyances from them which have put me off, but if they remove their top channel too, that'll be the last straw.

The link above will bring you to a detailed description, along with a convenient list of phone numbers and e-mail addresses of officials you can contact to register your complaint. Please contact them and let them know how you feel. There is also a survey and petition you can sign here.

18 June 2009

Are Canadians just unbelievably selfish?

Right now, people are being killed in Iran for protesting the fact that their voices aren't being heard. In Canada, we whine and stomp our feet because making our voices heard might bite into our vacation time. I have also heard Canadians whine about not having an election in winter because, horror of horrors, we might have to put our boots and coats on to go vote.

So, if not winter or summer, exactly when is the right time to fight for what's right?

Most of the people who don't qualify for EI are going to have trouble keeping their mortgages and bills paid. Helping them avoid foreclosure and/or welfare would be one of the most effective ways to combat this economic slump. But the Conservatives won't have it and the Liberals obviously don't have the balls to call an election over it, so these unemployed will twist in the wind while a "committee" argues over the same points that have already been argued in Question Period for weeks on end.

So why the hell aren't we helping people? Why aren't we demanding that help, bad election timing be damned? Is it because those who are employed don't want to give up their precious vacations so we can vote out the guy who won't help the less fortunate?

I want a leader who will stand up and ask these questions, and is willing to demand answers to those questions and immediate solutions. But apparently that's not going to happen anytime soon. Given the events in the last couple of days, I doubt Iggy's going to grow a pair by tomorrow.

And Parliament can sit all summer, as far as I'm concerned. They were paid by us the public for a full session, and only sat for a fraction of it, so I have no qualms about demanding that they continue to sit until an EI solution is put in place for the summer. All the more motivation for the Conservatives to stop putting obstacles in the way and take action now - they wouldn't want to miss their cushy summer vacations, after all.

Which brings me to the second point I touched on earlier. Is that shrinking group of Canadians who still hold jobs, so incredibly selfish, that they simply cannot bear to spend a little of their vacation time to vote out the guy who won't help those less fortunate than themselves? On they go, whining about how rough the winter was and about not wanting to cancel their reservations, and on and on. What the hell is wrong with people?

As a long-time American resident and citizen, I got to vote for the leader of the country once every 4 years, no matter how urgently we needed to kick out the current one. George W. Bush was only one especially obvious example. I treasured the opportunity to make my voice heard as often as possible because it wasn't heard nearly often enough. I've learned to value that opportunity and I'm eager to take advantage of it whenever it is offered. (I voted in every general election since I turned 18.) And let's face it: we already know what each party's platform is, and those platforms shape their policies in mostly predictable ways - so is it really that arduous a process to decide whom to vote for?

Canadians who think they have it so hard should try American voting, where you vote for several political candidates at federal, state, county, and municipal levels; plus judges, school district, water and other special districts; plus 10 or 15 state propositions and local measures, written in legalese, to read through and vote on at the same time. Take a look at the 2008 directory of contests and ballot for my former riding if you don't believe me. The 2008 Voter Information Guide was 144 pages plus a 16-page supplemental guide, just for the federal and state levels - the county and municipal stuff comes in another booklet. They also send you a sample ballot so you can mark it with your choices, since there's too much for most people to remember. Then when you're done with all that, you bring your sample ballot and go vote with a ballot card that slides into a slot behind the ballot pages, and then you go through each page and copy from your sample ballot using a special marker or stylus to mark or poke a hole in the card to indicate all your choices. Here in Canada, we get to concentrate on voting for just one seat - our Member of Parliament. We get to do some research and mull it over, then walk into the polling station, make one "X" and we're done. What's the big deal?

Weather is the last reason I'd expect for delaying an election. I lived in Los Angeles for many years so I am not accustomed to these Canadian winters; but I have now been here through 2 of the longest, harshest winters in recent memory and still would not hesitate to take the time and effort to do my research and brave the weather to go vote. I did it last October and I'd do it again in January, July, or anytime. Canadians' apparent aversion to voting, and for such petty and selfish reasons, is something I find both astonishing and disheartening - especially since voting is so simple and easy here. I love Canada and my fellow Canadians, and that is precisely why I think we can do better than attitudes like this.

16 June 2009

No to C-15 and a U.S.-style 'war on drugs!'

Prime Minister Harper is pushing a bill for mandatory sentences for drug crime. It has unfortunately passed in the House of Commons and is currently in the Senate. More here and here.

I lived in Los Angeles, the gang capital of the world, for many years and can personally attest that the largest single contributor to the gang problems is the illicit drug trade. They make big money from the sales of illicit drugs and use it to fund their other illegal endeavours. Mandatory minimum sentences and the "war on drugs" have not abated the gang problems in L.A. - instead, these problems have worsened dramatically over recent years, as anyone who follows L.A. news can plainly see. These are failed, expensive policies that Canadians can ill afford to adopt. I would love to put an end to drug-related crime, but I assure you C-15 will only exacerbate the problem. Please write your senator and ask him or her not to subject Canadians to this legislation, which experience tells us is doomed to fail.

07 June 2009

Support David Chen

Petition backs store owner charged after thief tied up

This is an outrage. If the police must exercise "triage," as they put it, to such an extent that criminals are allowed to victimize local businesses on a regular ongoing basis, then obviously there are not enough police on the force or else they aren't doing their jobs. Citizens trying to make an honest living are thus left with no other recourse than to perform a citizen's arrest. If this right is removed as well, criminals will rule the streets!

I know about neighbourhood blight from personal experience. I lived in Southern California (including Los Angeles) for many years, and most of the entire region has descended into gangland central over time. The first step necessary for this nasty downward spiral to occur in an area is for police to be too understaffed and/or apathetic to perform proper neighbourhood patrols when local crime is on the rise. The second is for its citizens to fail to take action against it, either due to not realizing the severity of the problem in time, ignorance of their rights (such as citizen's arrest), being stripped of their rights (as in this case), or later, hopelessness and/or fear of retribution from the criminals. This is how it starts. And frankly, I have found it impossible to explain to Canadians who have lived in Canada all their lives, just how truly bad it can get.

If you're not shocked and dismayed by this recent turn of events with Mr. Chen, you should be. His stripped rights are your stripped rights should you ever be victimized by crime. Even an effective, well-staffed police force can't have an officer on every corner - so if victim's rights are taken away, and the police continue to be ineffective, that's the beginning of the end for your neighbourhood. Take it from someone who knows.

God help us all if we're going to be expected to stand idly by while we or other law-abiding citizens are being victimized.

If you haven't yet signed the online petition, I encourage you to do so. It calls for a clearer definition of citizen's arrest, defence of victims' rights, and for the charges against Mr. Chen to be dropped, amongst other things.

05 June 2009

We are not the U.S.' clean-up crew - part 2

My other half said some things about the previous post which are worth sharing; I've paraphrased them here.
Send the detainees to George W. Bush's big ranch in Texas, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld's mansions, and John McCain's eight houses. There's plenty of room.

They created the problem; surely they won't mind being part of the solution.

Besides, Bush told President Obama "if you need anything I'll be right here." Looks like it's time to make that phone call, Mr. President.
 
nineteenthcentury-no